| Pipelines,
shredding, jibbers, and boardercross are all part of the colorful
trappings of what’s attracting winter sports lovers
to the country’s newest and most popular pursuit of
things-that-go-bump-in-the-snow.
Otherwise known as snowboarding.....
Originally embraced by preteen and adolescent
males who adapted ocean surfing and the fracture-prone sport
of skate boarding to the more forgiving environs of powdered
slopes, snowboarding has taken off wildly coast to coast.
Though skiing, its more patrician Great Uncle, still rules,
snowboarding — by its sheer exuberance and invitation
to daring antics — is increasingly drawing new fans.
Some say the sport originated in Michigan
in the mid-1960s when a dad joined two skis so his daughter
could “surf” down a snow-covered hillside. Board
designs evolved over the next two decades until adherents
had spread across the country — often banned from ski
resorts because of the excessive ‘enthusiasm’
displayed by its greatest fans, male teenagers. But snowboarding
grew despite, or perhaps because of, its “bad boy”
image. By the year 2000, a study on sports participation called
it the country’s fastest growing recreation, followed
by skateboarding. The study noted a 51.2% increase in participants
from the previous year to a total of slightly more than 7.2
million advocates. In that same period, responses indicated,
downhill skiers increased by only 6%, for a sum of 14.7 million
enthusiasts.
“We’ve seen lots of growth in
the past 10 to 15 years, with more organized classes and competitions
on the East and West coasts,” noted veteran adaptive
snow sports instructor Bobby Palm. “But more and more
adaptive programs are including snowboarding, so our new PSIA-Rocky
Mountain snowboard teaching guide is really timely. In essence,
what we’re telling instructors is that anything goes
in getting people of all ages into the fun of snowboarding
as long as safety is the prime consideration!” he added.
Teaching the Teachers…
Accordingly, adaptive snow sports centers across the U.S.
and beyond are offering lessons, equipment rentals, and designated
slopes and woodlands to keep snowboarders happy. Growing numbers
of PSIA instructors who specialize in teaching people with
physical disabilities are jumping onboard. Clinics, modified
equipment, and the new adaptive snowboarding instructional
manual are just part of meeting the demand.
Bobby, a nationally-recognized adaptive
sports expert, has been teaching people with disabilities
adaptive skiing since 1975 and snowboarding for the past decade.
He began in New Mexico as an instructor for kids with impairments
and moved to getting disabled veterans on the slopes. This
wealth of experience has been pooled with that of his colleagues
in adaptive snow sports to create the just-produced snowboarding
guide for the Rocky Mountain chapter of the Professional Ski
Instructors of America (PSIA) that’s to be distributed
at The Hartford Ski Spectacular in Breckenridge, Colo., in
December. A majority of the writing was done by Karen Frei,
with information and suggestions from Bobby and his colleagues
on the Adaptive Snowboarding Committee who have contributed
their time and expertise. They include Scott Anfang, Barbara
Szwebel, and Bryan Olson, along with Earl Saline who offered
substantial feedback and insights on the snowboarding end.
While Bobby has spent the past 28
years as an adaptive instructor, happenstance played a role
in his initial choice of a career. A forestry worker, the
seasonal nature of his job left him with lots of free time
in the winter.
“I volunteered two days a week
as an instructor at Ski Apache in southern New Mexico. Back
then, I was
somewhat uncomfortable around people with disabilities —
I wasn’t sure how to relate — so this was a good
opportunity to overcome that uneasiness. Before I knew it,
I was hooked on teaching disabled kids how to ski,”
he laughed.
When he’s not on the slopes,
Bobby is a contractor/builder
in Santa Fe, New Mexico. That pays the bills, but it’s
the adaptive sports portion of his life that delivers maximum
satisfaction.
“My goal isn’t to run
programs, but to stay outside in the snow with the students
— in the trenches. I design a lot of equipment variations
and give the designs to manufacturers. Then I test the prototypes.
They keep me supplied with equipment, so it’s a great
system,” he explained.
Rich Ganson with
pupil Danielle Coulter. |
A PSIA examiner and trainer for Challenge
Aspen, Bobby has traveled across the nation and internationally
— to Spain, Argentina, Korea, and Chile — to present
adaptive snow sports clinics and teach instructors. His Colorado
clinics have included sessions at Crested Butte, Telluride,
Vail, Aspen, Steamboat, and Breckenridge. In recent years,
he notes, most adaptive skiing programs have been expanded
to include snowboarding.
“We’ve been trying to
develop a safe methodology that can offer instructors and
students the same options that we presently have for skiing.
We design a lesson to accommodate both the student’s
disability and the adaptive equipment available. We work on
an individual basis with what we have,” he noted simply.
As far as Bobby is concerned, most
kids and adults with physical and cognitive disabilities can
experience the fun of snowboarding with the proper preparation
and equipment. True to teaching any adaptive sport, safety
for both the student and the other people in the area is the
foremost consideration.
In much the same way that disabled
athletes mastered adaptive ski equipment and techniques to
bring their sport to a Paralympic level, it’s likely
that adaptive snowboarders will also be producing glitzy moves
and gravity-defying tricks suitable for international competition.
Already, talented enthusiasts are divided between alpine and
freerider snowboarders who value speed and deeply carved slalom
turns, and the freestyle artist whose skill lies in tricks.
For each, however, the attraction lies in combining snow and
gravity for a wholesome, invigorating, and — most importantly
— inclusive outdoor recreation experience.
“We’re learning and sharing
things all the time as we improve our teaching methods,”
Bobby stressed.
“Some prosthetic components
and orthopedic braces can take a real pounding in this sport,
while others may require using some restraint. Adaptive equipment
also has limitations which both the instructor and student
must recognize. And most importantly, it’s vital that
instructors are sensitive to each student’s strengths
and abilities — boosting confidence and self-esteem
while ensuring safety at all times — and then devise
the appropriate equipment adaptations and teaching technique.
With this depth of training and understanding, virtually anyone
can participate on some level.
“An individual approach is key.
No student wants to do the same thing as everyone else —
everybody wants to do something different — but there’s
a lot of cross-over in adaptive snow sports. Whether there’s
more of a sense of ‘freedom’ in snowboarding versus
skiing is all in the participant’s head,” he continued.
“What we’re most concerned
with is seeing that kids and adults have a good time in the
snow..... that people experience the simple joy of sliding....”
The new PSIA-Rocky Mountain snowboarding
guide, specifically designed not to duplicate information
found in the adaptive skiing instructions, offers detailed
suggestions on teaching adults and children with a wide variety
of disabilities. While stressing that students are all unique,
the guide offers strength/weakness characteristics typical
of people who fit into certain categories such as vision impairment
(VI), hard of hearing (HOH), cognitive and neurological disorders,
structural/anatomical anomalies (amputees), and combinations
of impairments. Some conditions that would fall under these
general categories would be arthritis, cancer, multiple sclerosis,
muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy, diabetes, post-polio,
spina bifida, and partial hemiplegia.
Chapters in the new manual cover such topics
as assessing students individually in terms of physical function
and equipment needs, differences in teaching methods required
for various disabilities, fitting students to adaptive equipment,
choices in adaptive equipment, progression from basic to more
advanced snowboarding techniques, and how to locate suppliers.
Start With
Evaluations....
Prospective snowboarders with amputations or limb discrepancies
will be reviewed according to their functional abilities as
well as the type of prosthesis worn. For those with lower
limb impairment, instructors must assess which is the stronger
or more coordinated leg — not always the same, according
to the manual. That evaluation will determine which becomes
the lead foot on the board. Instructors are reminded that
lack of feeling in a prosthetic foot or residual limb slippage
within a socket can decrease control of part of the board.
Also checked is the prosthetic leg’s
degree of flexibility at the ankle and knee, and how much
weight-bearing it can take. One solution is to use a heel
lift in the boot in which the prosthesis is fitted to move
the rider into a flexed stance. A trained instructor will
work with the student to determine which type of stance is
most comfortable and provides more control of the snowboard.
The amputee’s prosthetist should also be made
aware that the prosthesis will be used for
snowboarding and consulted as to whether it is suitable or
if a sports prosthesis is necessary.
Lower limb amputees who use a chair lift
also present considerations since the rider is strapped into
the board while heading for the top of the hill. It may be
necessary to additionally secure a leg prosthesis with a knee
strap and waist belt to keep the board’s weight from
pulling the prosthesis loose. Adaptive instructors have found
that upper limb amputees may or may not wear a prosthesis.
Balance isn’t generally an issue for these people, but
they must be reminded to keep their shoulders and arms forward
and in the direction they’re moving, rather than weakening
their stance by thrusting the amputated arm/shoulder back.
When it comes to instructing people with
cerebral palsy, teachers are told that students can vary widely
in both physical and cognitive abilities, so once again, individual
assessment is crucial. Three types of spasms, which may appear
singly or in combination with a CP learner, are identified
in the new guide. A general problem is that muscle weakness
may produce fatigue earlier than with some other students.
 |
| Volunteer instructor Francisco works
with Nicolas, an upper extremity amputee, in Chile. |
Beginning snowboarders who wear ankle foot
orthoses (AFOs) or other types of leg braces will almost certainly
need these on the slopes, the trainers are reminded. Most
AFOs will fit into a snowboard boot, even if it needs to be
one size larger. And, in the case of leg length discrepancy,
differences can be equalized by inserting a shim or lift in
the boot or between the binding and the boot, or under the
binding. If leg weakness is a factor in both limbs, the student
might benefit from using one or two outriggers, the manual
adds.
Equipment
Comes Next...
As with any adaptive sport, equipment may either be rented
or purchased, depending on the supply carried at the site
where lessons are held. It’s always best to inquire
in advance as to what is available when arrangements are being
made for lessons.
Boots:
Designed to support the foot and keep the heel down, snowboard
boots should fit snugly but not be too tight since movement
generated by the body is transferred to the board via the
boots. The ideal boot flexes to the degree the rider wishes;
it should be comfortable and functional. If avoiding pressure
areas or accommodating an AFO are concerns, the rider may
need each boot in a different size.
The next choice is soft or hard boot. Softer
styles deliver greater ankle flexibility and freedom of movement,
while a stiffer boot offers increased ankle and foot support.
Hard shell boots, similar to an alpine ski boot, aren’t
as readily found, are harder to fit, and don’t prove
as versatile in variable terrain or snow conditions since
ankle movement is more restricted.
Bindings:
All snowboard bindings prevent release of the board for safety
considerations. While some bindings must be paired with a
particular boot, most are easily adjusted to accept a change
in stance. And board responsiveness is directly related to
how snugly the foot fits the boot, plus how much “wiggle”
exists between the boot and binding. As students advance in
skill, adjustments may be made for increased control.
Binding choices range from strap —
the most popular — to step-in, which is boot-specific,
and plate, which is designed for hard or alpine boots.
Snowboard:
In general, snowboards are chosen on the basis of the rider’s
height, weight, and ability level, with the upright board’s
length usually between the rider’s chin and nose. While
designs are similar, details separate choices into three styles
— freestyle, freeriding, and alpine/race boards.
A freestyle board, also known as a twin
tip, has an equally turned up tip and tail, and a soft flex.
Extremely versatile, it can easily be ridden in either direction
and is a good choice for beginners.
The freeriding or directional board is slightly
stiffer and performs differently when going forward or backward.
There is more stability when going forward, but the board
also adapts well to different riding styles, types of terrain,
and stance options.
Stiffer and less forgiving for the inexperienced
rider, the alpine board has a more upturned nose than tail
and a narrower mid-section. It is highly responsive and cuts
or “carves” deeply through gates and when riding
in groomed terrain, but is less
versatile in varied terrain and snow conditions.
Stance
A major decision is the choice of stance, how the feet are
positioned on the snowboard. Stance involves the angle of
feet to the board’s edge, the distance between the feet,
and which foot is deemed in the lead. For best results, a
stance should be comfortable and place balance equally over
both feet. An aligned stance helps maintain stability while
riding; a directional or race stance lets the student effectively
use two outriggers; a duck stance points one foot forward
and the other to the rear, keeping muscles relaxed; and the
open stance, with each foot set at a different degree, is
appropriate for beginners to intermediate riders.
Choice of a stance should relate to the
student’s balance, or how far the body can move without
losing stability. Retaining balance is accomplished by adjustments
to the ankles, knees, hips, and entire body; consideration
is also given as to whether the student uses the ankle or
knee as the primary flexing joint.
Adaptive
Equipment
As snowboarding grows in popularity, options in equipment
and teaching aids increase. Choices are divided into equipment
which a student uses independently and that which is instructor
guided or assisted. Appropriate equipment is ability-oriented
and based on whether a student has sufficient balance and
strength to ride vertically or needs to use a mono-ski type
of adaptation.
Used by independent riders, ski poles can
assist static balance, propulsion along a flat surface, or
help initiate a turn; a nordic style bamboo pole helps with
turning and slowing down. Devices such as the horse ‘n’
buggy, hula-hoop, and Board Buddy let an instructor assist
with balance and initiating turns while avoiding direct hands-on
teaching. All involve tubing around the student’s waist
which is attached to long poles held by the instructor. The
horse ‘n’ buggy system is more snug, letting the
teacher initiate turns as well as control speed, while hula-hoop
offers the student some stability but is too loose to control
turns. The Board Buddy operates like a wind surfer boom with
a belt that encircles the student’s waist.
Another option is one or two outriggers.
Canadian-style crutches with a ski tip at the end, they aid
balance and lessen fatigue, and some are shock-absorbing.
Students with weakness in the lower body may benefit from
a rider bar, an upside down, waist-high U-shaped bar mounted
under the bindings. Riders can stabilize the upper body by
holding on — pushing it forward to move to the toe edge,
and backward to move to the heel edge.
Tethering, an option used for many students,
helps the instructor control speed and direction as well as
initiate turns. The tether is attached to the front of the
board rather than the student, its placement depending on
many variables.
A tandem board has two sets of bindings
to accommodate both student and instructor. It was developed
in Europe and used for instructing students with impaired
vision, but it’s a valuable tool for working with beginners
with many types of impairments. The tandem lets students experience
the fun of dynamic riding without worrying about controlling
the board.
Finally, a sit-board has a mono-ski seat
or similar rig mounted on the board for those who can’t
ride in a standing position. Depending on the seat’s
height from the snow, students can either use their arms,
a hand-pick, or an outrigger to initiate turns.
As
with adaptive skiing, a thorough evaluation of the rider’s
abilities, together with practice on various types of rental
equipment, is generally a good idea before making a major
investment in purchasing equipment. The main objective is
to locate an adaptive snowboarding program with experienced,
certified instructors who can safely transform an introduction
to snowboarding into many long years of fun in snow country.
For most of us, winter is inescapable, so we may as well put
all that snow to good use.
| Visually-impaired snowboarder
William Pabbiz (avoe and below) and his guide Nathan Magnusen
at the New England Sports Cinic for the Disabled Veterans
at Mt. Sunapee, NH. William lost his sight while
on active duty. |
More information about snowboarding can
be obtained from the following DS/USA Chapters. Follow up
for information about lessons, programs, and clinics in your
area!
Sail, Inc./ORCA
(Outdoor Recreation and Community Access)
P.O. Box 35097, Juneau, AK 99801-7863
Contact: Sierra Kaden • Phone: 907-586-0104/907-321-2704
E-mail: sierrakaden@sailinc.org
U.S. Adaptive Recreation Center
P.O. Box 2897, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315-2897
Contact: KelLe Malkewitz • Phone: 909-584-0269
E-mail: malkewitzk@usarc.org • Web site: www.usarc.org
Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte
P.O. Box 1639, Crested Butte, CO 81224
Contact: Chris Hensely • Phone: 970-349-2296 or 866-349-2296
E-mail: director@adaptivesports.org • Web Site: www.adaptivesports.org
Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center
P.O. Box 697, Breckenridge, CO 80424
Contact: Lisa Seaman • Phone: 970-453-6422
E-mail: boec@boec.org • Web Site: www.boec.org
Durango/Purgatory Handicapped Sports Association
P.O. Box 1884, Durango, CO 81302
Contact: Timothy Kroes • Phone: 970-385-2163
E-mail: asa@frontier.net • Web Site: www.asadurango.org
National Sports Center for the Disabled
P.O. Box 1290, Winter Park, CO 80482
Contact: Paul DiBello • Phone: 970-726-1548
E-mail: paul@nscd.org • Web Site: www.nscd.org
Telluride Adaptive Sports Program
P.O. Box 2254, Telluride, CO 81435
Contact: Colleen Trout • Phone: 970-728-7537
E-mail: tasp@independence.net • Web Site: www.skitasp.org
Central Maine Adaptive Sports
P.O. Box 260, Auburn, ME 04210
Contact: Linc Hayes • Phone: 207-786-0356
E-mail: mcnulty@pivot.net
Maine Handicapped Skiing
8 Sundance Lane, Newry, ME 04261
Contact: Betsy Doyon • Phone: 800-639-7770 • 207-824-2440
E-mail: info@skimhs.org • Web Site: www.skimhs.org
New England Handicapped Sports Association
[NEHSA]
P.O. Box 2135, Newbury, NH 03255-2135
Contact: Amanda Rucci • Phone: 603-763-9158/800-628-4484
E-mail: info@nehsa.org • Web Site: www.nehsa.org
Adaptive Sports Foundation
16A Thompson Court, c/o Windham Mountain
CD Lane Road, Windham, NY 12496
Contact: Gwen Allard • Phone: 518-734-5070
E-mail: asfwindham@aol.com
Web Site: www.adaptivesportsfoundation.org
Greek Peak Sports for the Disabled
508 Verna Drive, Endwell, NY 13760
Contacts: Dick Wierman/Peter Rogers
Phone: 607-785-6960/607-785-1008
E-mail: jonabby@aol.com
National Ability Center
P.O. Box 682799, Park City, UT 84068
Contact: Meeche White • Phone: 435-649-3991
E-mail: meechew@nac1985.org • Web Site: www.nac1985.org
PHOTOS – Photos courtesy of
Challenge Aspen. |